May 8, 2014
the-evil-conservative:

iammyfather:

the-evil-conservative:

oceanicsteam:

And here is your hypocrite of the day.

The reason he doesn’t want government involved in health care is because he knows market forces decrease costs. That’s good for society.

Then lead by example.

That doesn’t make sense. In order to reap the benefits of market forces we need a change of policy in health care.

What is the marginal utility of your survival?  Of the survival of your children?  Will a pandemic virus ask for your insurance card?  At what point does this quasi-religious faith in “markets” finally fail?

the-evil-conservative:

iammyfather:

the-evil-conservative:

oceanicsteam:

And here is your hypocrite of the day.

The reason he doesn’t want government involved in health care is because he knows market forces decrease costs. That’s good for society.

Then lead by example.

That doesn’t make sense. In order to reap the benefits of market forces we need a change of policy in health care.

What is the marginal utility of your survival? Of the survival of your children? Will a pandemic virus ask for your insurance card? At what point does this quasi-religious faith in “markets” finally fail?

(via the-evil-conservative-deactivat)

June 2, 2012
forwhenifeellikesharing: Actual Forms of “Self Care:”

forwhenifeellikesharing:

Exercising regularly, paying your bills on time, staying informed, cultivating meaningful friendships, brushing and flossing regularly, having healthy adult relationships with your parents (and siblings) in whatever capacity you can, reading more, setting short- and long-term goals, working towards short- and long-term goals, going to sleep instead of passing out, owning your bullshit, sitting with good posture, not taking everything personally, letting things go, eating well, expressing your feelings like an adult, becoming aware of your self-destructive behaviors, doing things you enjoy that aren’t self-destructive behaviors, limiting self-pity, apologizing when necessary, drinking enough water, realizing anger and resentment are not sustainable forms of life-fuel, being self-critical while not self-shredding, responding to criticism with informed opinions or not responding at all, and most importantly: being “present” without delusions of what it means to be “present.”

April 13, 2012
kateoplis via LTMC: Is Prohibition Working?

letterstomycountry:

George Will: Should the US legalize hard drugs?

kateoplis:

Amelioration of today’s drug problem requires Americans to understand the significance of the 80-20 ratio. Twenty percent of American drinkers consume 80 percent of the alcohol sold here. The same 80-20 split obtains among users of illicit drugs. About 3 million people — less than 1 percent of America’s population — consume 80 percent of illegal hard drugs. Drug-trafficking organizations can be most efficiently injured by changing the behavior of the 20 percent of heavy users, and we are learning how to do so. Reducing consumption by the 80 percent of casual users will not substantially reduce the northward flow of drugs or the southward flow of money. […]

In “Drugs and Drug Policy: What Everyone Needs to Know,” policy analysts Mark Kleiman, Jonathan Caulkins and Angela Hawken argue that imprisoning low-ranking street-corner dealers is pointless: A $200 transaction can cost society $100,000 for a three-year sentence. And imprisoning large numbers of dealers produces an army of people who, emerging from prison with blighted employment prospects, can only deal drugs. Which is why, although a few years ago Washington, D.C., dealers earned an average of $30 an hour, today they earn less than the federal minimum wage ($7.25).

Dealers, a.k.a. “pushers,” have almost nothing to do with initiating drug use by future addicts; almost every user starts when given drugs by a friend, sibling or acquaintance. There is a staggering disparity between the trivial sums earned by dealers who connect the cartels to the cartels’ customers and the huge sums trying to slow the flow of drugs to those street-level dealers. Kleiman, Caulkins and Hawken say that, in developed nations, cocaine sells for about $3,000 per ounce — almost twice the price of gold. And the supply of cocaine, unlike that of gold, can be cheaply and quickly expanded. But in the countries where cocaine and heroin are produced, they sell for about 1 percent of their retail price in the United States. If cocaine were legalized, a $2,000 kilogram could be FedExed from Colombia for less than $50 and sold profitably here for a small markup from its price in Colombia, and a $5 rock of crack might cost 25 cents. Criminalization drives the cost of the smuggled kilogram in the United States up to $20,000. But then it retails for more than $100,000. […]

Marijuana probably provides less than 25 percent of the cartels’ revenue. Legalizing it would take perhaps $10 billion from some bad and violent people, but the cartels would still make much more money from cocaine, heroin and methamphetamines than they would lose from marijuana legalization.

Sixteen states and the District have legalized “medical marijuana,” a messy, mendacious semi-legalization that breeds cynicism regarding law. In 1990, 24 percent of Americans supported full legalization. Today, 50 percent do. In 2010, in California, where one-eighth of Americans live, 46 percent of voters supported legalization, and some opponents were marijuana growers who like the profits they make from prohibition of their product.

Would the public health problems resulting from legalization be a price worth paying for injuring the cartels and reducing the costs of enforcement? We probably are going to find out.”

Liked posts on Tumblr: More liked posts »