LOL!
On that note, I think I’ll go outside and play.
I’ll see y’all again this evening, Family. :-)
(Source: memewhore, via lorenzens-soil)

LOL!
On that note, I think I’ll go outside and play.
I’ll see y’all again this evening, Family. :-)
(Source: memewhore, via lorenzens-soil)
But still wets bed.
(reblogged for the commentary)
New Internet Service Provider Will Defy Government Surveillance (Must Read)
Nicholas Merrill is planning to revolutionize online privacy with a concept as simple as it is ingenious: a telecommunications provider designed from its inception to shield its customers from surveillance.
Merrill, 39, who previously ran a New York-based Internet provider, told CNET that he’s raising funds to launch a national “non-profit telecommunications provider dedicated to privacy, using ubiquitous encryption” that will sell mobile phone service and, for as little as $20 a month, Internet connectivity.
The ISP would not merely employ every technological means at its disposal, including encryption and limited logging, to protect its customers. It would also — and in practice this is likely more important — challenge government surveillance demands of dubious legality or constitutionality.
By contrast, Merrill says his ISP, to be run by a non-profit called the Calyx Institute with for-profit subsidiaries, will put customers first. “Calyx will use all legal and technical means available to protect the privacy and integrity of user data,” he says.
More (It’s worth the read)
A New Sort of “Arms Race”
The U.S. government (specifically the National Security Agency) is presently constructing the mammoth Utah Data Center in a patch of desert between the Wasatch Range and the Oquirrh Mountains. The ambitious mission of the Utah Data Center is to monitor, store, and analyze all relevant signal including (but not limited to) transoceanic cables, private emails, mobile phone calls and Google searches, as well as personal data trails — travel itineraries, purchases, ad infinitum et nauseum. One senior intelligence official who has worked on the project notes, “…everybody’s a target; everybody with communication is a target.”
And so Nicholas Merrill strides into this matrix of surveillance with his built-black-from-the-earth-up darknet, and the race is on!
(via other-stuff)
I logged on with my facebook. No one knew me.
Although I uttered not a single unkind word, I was banned from that room.
(!) […]
Well…I won’t be doing that twice.
Collusion is an add-on for the Firefox browser. This add-on will display an interactive map of third-party sites that begin tracking you as you move about the web. Collusion will also notify you in real-time when a site begins tracking you. (The add-on emits an audio alarm similar to the sound of a camera’s shutter.)
About an hour on the web generated the above map for me. I surfed Tumblr (25 min.), did some banking (10 min.), and searched Bing to try to find the estimated rare-earth-metal content of the asteroids (25 min.). In all, I hit about ten sites, and those sites are set apart with a halo in the map. All the other nodes in the map are third-party trackers. Just look at the size of that map!
The Collusion add-on certainly opened my eyes. You can get yours here.
في حال انقطاع خدمة الانترنت في سوريا يمكنكم استخدام اﻷرقام التالية للوصول إلى الشبكة:
+4618700800 user:flashback pw: flashback
+3908251872424 any user/password
+3909241962424 any user/password
+16033715050 any user/password
+431962962 user: selfnet password: selfnet
+492317299993 user: telecomix password: telecomix
+33 1 72 89 01 50. login: toto password: toto by FDN
Theft of books digitally is in no way the same thing as a library. The number of people who have to drive to the library and check out a physical book one at a time is not even remotely comparable to the thousands, if not tens of thousands, of people who can download the digital copy of a book from the comfort of their homes from a pirate site.
Every single one of those thefts negatively impacts the hundreds of hours that I spent writing and editing that book. I am not a millionaire. I am a writer who sweats every word out after she works a full-time day job. I am a writer trying to build an audience and maybe, one day, get to write full time. Every single sale matters to me. If you respect me as a person, as a writer, you will not steal my book. Period.
^An author’s perspective on the library/file-sharing comparison. At the end of the day, people who create things DO deserve to be paid for their work. Although I can get books digitally from my library, I’m sure that (completely legal) service is used a lot less often than pirating websites.
The issue of piracy goes way beyond whether or not it’s ethical to download things without any money going to the author. It would be great if everything was free and open to the public and I would support that idea 100%… if our economic system was set up in such a way that rendered piracy relatively irrelevant to the people depending on their art to make a living. (Pirating is one of the many reasons why being an artist is scoffed at as being such a bad way to make a living. Things shouldn’t be like that. If you want to make a living as an artist, you should be able to. Period.) Unfortunately, though, our economic system is not set up that way, and stealing from authors and musicians hurts them and keeps them working jobs that they probably hate and you probably want because, statistically, there’s a really good chance that you’re unemployed.
I know stealing things often feels harmless to people, but someone often is losing a job, losing money, or losing pay, because you decided to steal something.
*This does not apply to pirating from artists who make enormous amounts of money, nor does it apply to pirating things from companies that make enormous amounts of money. That is another ethical question altogether and one that I would prefer not to address at this time. Note that “pirating” is a key word, because stealing from stores is what gets those low-wage workers fired.
Here’s the thing though: if you create something expecting people to pay you for it, I will never pity you when people pirate it for their own enjoyment. Creativity is something to be shared, not sold. If you’re doing art for any reason other than the love of creating, you’re in it for the wrong reasons.
If you make something that you think people will love but you restrict access to it based on who can pay you and who cannot, you are the worst sort of wretched creature there is (not to put too fine a point on it).
The issues this discussion confronts should not be posed in terms of access vs. theft. Issues of compensation for content providers are better addressed by a new publishing model—a subscription service. Assume that only one-third of the US population has broadband internet service. That makes for about 107 million internet users. If this group paid US$15.00 each month for a subscription to an internet publisher than the pool of cash generated would equal one billion, six hundred million US dollars each month. An artist would receive compensation based on the number of downloads his/her work generated.
A subscription publishing service removes an army of middlemen presently acting as the gatekeepers (or prison guards) of art. Such a publishing model also relieves these middlemen of their role as the arbiters of public taste. For an artist, this brave new world poses great incentives and great challenges. No longer will an artist have to ask, “How can I be heard?” Rather, an artist will have to successfully answer the question, “How can I cut through the clutter?”
— SOPA: Washington Vs. The Web (via azspot)
(via azspot)
RT URGENT The Avaaz team STOP #SOPA
Avaaz is delivering our messages directly to senior White House officials in less than 24 hours - let’s reach 1 million signatures before then! We’re nearly there — sign now and share with everyone
Dear friends,
Right now, the US Congress is debating a law that would give them the power to censor the world’s Internet — creating a blacklist that could target YouTube, WikiLeaks and even groups like Avaaz!
Under the new law, the US could force Internet providers to block any website on suspicion of violating copyright or trademark legislation, or even failing to sufficiently police their users’ activities. And, because so much of the Internet’s hosts and hardware are located in the US, their blacklist would clamp down on the free web for all of us.
The vote could happen any day now, but we can help stop this — champions in Congress want to preserve free speech and tell us that an international outcry would strengthen their hand. Let’s urgently raise our voices from every corner of the world and build an unprecedented global petition calling on US decision makers to reject the bill and stop Internet censorship. Click below to sign and then forward as widely as possible — our message will be delivered directly to key members of the US Congress ahead of the crucial vote:
http://www.avaaz.org/en/save_the_internet/?tta
For years, the US government has condemned countries like China and Iran for their clampdown on Internet use. But now, the impact of America’s new censorship laws could be far worse - effectively blocking sites to every Internet user across the globe.
Last year, a similar Internet censorship bill was killed before reaching the US Senate floor, but it has now been refashioned and is back on the table. The new draft grants the government and big corporations enormous powers to force ISPs and search engines to prevent access to sites blacklisted because of allegations of online infringement. But the bill goes even further, also targeting service providers for not doing enough to track and enforce infringement rules, or for providing tools to help US Internet users access sites on the blacklist. Any website can be blocked by the order of a federal judge, without even being found guilty of any crime.
US free speech advocates have already raised the alarm, and some key senators are trying to gather enough support to stop this dangerous bill. We have no time to lose. Let’s stand with them to ensure American lawmakers preserve the right to a free and open Internet as an essential way for people around the world to exchange ideas, share communication and work collectively to build the world we want. Sign below to stop the US Internet Blacklist:
http://www.avaaz.org/en/save_the_internet/?tta
In the past months, from the Arab Spring to the global Occupy Movement, we’ve seen first hand how the Internet can galvanize, unify and change the world. Now we can stop this new attack on Internet freedom if we stand together. We’ve done it before. In Brazil and Italy, Avaaz members have won major victories in the right for a free Internet. Let’s galvanize our global web community and crush the most powerful censorship threat that the Internet has ever seen.
With hope,
Luis, Dalia, Diego, Emma, Ricken, Aaron, Antonia, Benjamin and the rest of the Avaaz team
More information:
Op-Ed: Blacklist Bill allows Feds to remove websites from Internet (Digital Journal)
http://digitaljournal.com/article/313463
Disastrous IP Legislation Is Back – And It’s Worse than Ever (EFF)
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2011/10/disastrous-ip-legislation-back-–-and-it’s-worse-ever
Silicon Valley legislators oppose online piracy act (SFGate)
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/11/15/BUO81LV0KI.DTL
House Hearing on Stop Online Piracy Act Scheduled (PC World)
http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/243659/house_hearing_on_stop_online_piracy_act_scheduled.html
Avaaz.org is a 10-million-person global campaign network that works to ensure that the views and values of the world’s people shape global decision-making. (“Avaaz” means “voice” or “song” in many languages.) Avaaz members live in every nation of the world; our team is spread across 13 countries on 4 continents and operates in 14 languages. Learn about some of Avaaz’s biggest campaigns here, or follow us on Facebook or Twitter.