May 26, 2012
quickhits:

The conservative PC zombie clone herd.

Paul Krugman:
Remember the furor over liberal political correctness? Yes, some of it was over the top — but it was mainly silly, not something that actually warped our national discussion. Today, however, the big threat to our discourse is right-wing political correctness, which — unlike the liberal version — has lots of power and money behind it. And the goal is very much the kind of thing Orwell tried to convey with his notion of Newspeak: to make it impossible to talk, and possibly even think, about ideas that challenge the established order. Thus, even talking about “the wealthy” brings angry denunciations; we’re supposed to call them “job creators”. Even talking about inequality is “class warfare”.

Krugman goes on to describe how this is most visible in attacks on education; “even talking about ‘immigration and ethnicity’ or ‘environmental history’ becomes part of a left-wing conspiracy.” It’s a Soviet-style rewriting of history, where “counter-revolutionary” (i.e., contrary to party doctrine) facts are airbrushed out of textbooks. He uses attacks on higher ed as an example, but let’s not forget the Texas textbook controversy, where the state of Texas decided it would be a good idea to produce the most poorly informed high school students in the nation. Or the Tennessee Tea Party demanding that kids stop being taught about slavery.
The idea is simple; remove all inconvenient facts from American life and rhetoric. And leave only those facts (or “facts”) that make conservatives look good. One people, one mind, one hive.


Soundtrack for the 21st century by Peter Gabriel:We Do What We’re Told
We do what we’re told.
We do what we’re told.
We do what we’re told—
    told to do.
One doubt, one voice, one war, one truth,
One dream!

quickhits:

The conservative PC zombie clone herd.

Paul Krugman:

Remember the furor over liberal political correctness? Yes, some of it was over the top — but it was mainly silly, not something that actually warped our national discussion.

Today, however, the big threat to our discourse is right-wing political correctness, which — unlike the liberal version — has lots of power and money behind it. And the goal is very much the kind of thing Orwell tried to convey with his notion of Newspeak: to make it impossible to talk, and possibly even think, about ideas that challenge the established order.

Thus, even talking about “the wealthy” brings angry denunciations; we’re supposed to call them “job creators”. Even talking about inequality is “class warfare”.

Krugman goes on to describe how this is most visible in attacks on education; “even talking about ‘immigration and ethnicity’ or ‘environmental history’ becomes part of a left-wing conspiracy.” It’s a Soviet-style rewriting of history, where “counter-revolutionary” (i.e., contrary to party doctrine) facts are airbrushed out of textbooks. He uses attacks on higher ed as an example, but let’s not forget the Texas textbook controversy, where the state of Texas decided it would be a good idea to produce the most poorly informed high school students in the nation. Or the Tennessee Tea Party demanding that kids stop being taught about slavery.

The idea is simple; remove all inconvenient facts from American life and rhetoric. And leave only those facts (or “facts”) that make conservatives look good. One people, one mind, one hive.

Soundtrack for the 21st century by Peter Gabriel:

We Do What We’re Told

We do what we’re told.
We do what we’re told.
We do what we’re told—
    told to do.
One doubt, one voice, one war, one truth,
One dream!

(via other-stuff)

May 26, 2012
kariflack: herein lies the problem

kariflack:

“She believes that, ultimately, true mutuality and equality between the sexes are possible, but they are dependent on every woman resisting the status quo and critically examining her life choices. Men, she argues, would be forced to change if women did.”

From this generous write-up on…

On some evenings, kariflack is the sole bright spot on my dash.

May 23, 2012
Republican rhetoric leaves me with the depressing sensation that somehow I’ve ended up in-country in my own country.  Very well, Mr. Mourdock, bring it.  In the final tally you and your party will be defeated by all the crafty Americans who have so brazenly infiltrated the land of their birth.

Republican rhetoric leaves me with the depressing sensation that somehow I’ve ended up in-country in my own country. Very well, Mr. Mourdock, bring it. In the final tally you and your party will be defeated by all the crafty Americans who have so brazenly infiltrated the land of their birth.

(Source: jilli1205, via radon-t)

May 19, 2012

hookedonsemiotics:

iamrickperry:

myworldyourcomputer:

I. Can’t. Stand. Him.

well excus me

ILU RICK

Governor Rick Perry is not smart enough to be a game-show host.
That’s why he is a Texas politician.

May 19, 2012
"The focus of class struggle can shift from the direct confrontation between capital and labour on to a confrontation between workers and the state. The latter thereby becomes a protective shield for capitalist class interests. It may even appear, with some not so subtle help from bourgeois propoganda, as if inflation has its origins in inefficient and ineffective government, in erroneous fiscal and monetary policies. This attribution is correct as regards the immediate cause. What it ignores is the underlying structure of class relations which generates crises of overaccumulation-devaluation in the first place."

— David Harvey (via antisocial-socialist)

(via pieceinthepuzzlehumanity)

May 14, 2012
"No human being is one dimensional. I’m sure there are plenty of people in the world for whom Mitt has performed kindnesses. I expect we’ll be getting to know every single one of them in these next few months, too, in heavily filtered television ads in which the men wear proletarian flannel and the women’s St. John blazers are kept safely in the closet. All I can say is they’d better be more likeable than their candidate—for his sake. In the meantime, there’s something very reassuring about this country reposing in those numbers, that the black guy with the weird name who’s been called everything under the sun is twice as likeable as the rich white guy. This is the America that drives the wingers crazy, but that the rest of us—the majority—live in, and love."

Michael Tomasky on Mitt Romney, the Unlikable Presidential Candidate (via azspot)

(via azspot)

May 10, 2012
How J.P. Morgan Chase Has Made the Case for Breaking Up The Big Banks and Resurrecting Glass-Steagall

nixonplumbingco:

robertreich:

J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., the nation’s largest bank, whose chief executive, Jamie Dimon, has lead Wall Street’s war against regulation, announced Thursday it had lost $2 billion in trades over the past six weeks and could face an additional $1 billion of losses, due to excessively risky bets.

The bets were “poorly executed” and “poorly monitored,” said Dimon, a result of “many errors, “sloppiness,” and “bad judgment.” But not to worry. “We will admit it, we will fix it and move on.”

Move on? Word on the Street is that J.P. Morgan’s exposure is so large that it can’t dump these bad bets without affecting the market and losing even more money. And given its mammoth size and interlinked connections with every other financial institution, anything that shakes J.P. Morgan is likely to rock the rest of the Street.

Ever since the start of the banking crisis in 2008, Dimon has been arguing that more government regulation of Wall Street is unnecessary. Last year he vehemently and loudly opposed the so-called Volcker rule, itself a watered-down version of the old Glass-Steagall Act that used to separate commercial from investment banking before it was repealed in 1999, saying it would unnecessarily impinge on derivative trading (the lucrative practice of making bets on bets) and hedging (using some bets to offset the risks of other bets).

Dimon argued that the financial system could be trusted; that the near-meltdown of 2008 was a perfect storm that would never happen again.

Since then, J.P. Morgan’s lobbyists and lawyers have done everything in their power to eviscerate the Volcker rule — creating exceptions, exemptions, and loopholes that effectively allow any big bank to go on doing most of the derivative trading it was doing before the near-meltdown.

And now — only a few years after the banking crisis that forced American taxpayers to bail out the Street, caused home values to plunge by more than 30 percent and pushed millions of homeowners underwater, threaten or diminish the savings of millions more, and send the entire American economy hurtling into the worst downturn since the Great Depression — J.P. Morgan Chase recapitulates the whole debacle with the same kind of errors, sloppiness, bad judgment, excessively risky trades poorly-executed and poorly-monitored, that caused the crisis in the first place.

In light of all this, Jamie Dimon’s promise that J.P. Morgan will “fix it and move on” is not reassuring.

The losses here had been mounting for at least six weeks, according to Morgan. Where was the new transparency that’s supposed to allow regulators to catch these things before they get out of hand?

Several weeks ago there were rumors about a London-based Morgan trader making huge high-stakes bets, causing excessive volatility in derivatives markets. When asked about it then, Dimon called it “a complete tempest in a teapot.” Using the same argument he has used to fend off regulation of derivatives, he told investors that “every bank has a major portfolio” and “in those portfolios you make investments that you think are wise to offset your exposures.”

 

Let’s hope Morgan’s losses don’t turn into another crisis of confidence and they don’t spread to the rest of the financial sector.

But let’s also stop hoping Wall Street will mend itself. What just happened at J.P. Morgan – along with its leader’s cavalier cover-up followed by lame reassurance – reveals how fragile and opaque the banking system continues to be, why Glass-Steagall must be resurrected, and why the Dallas Fed’s recent recommendation that Wall Street’s giant banks be broken up should be heeded. 

Proof positive that the resurrection of Glass-Steagall is necessary, not only to protect ourselves from future crisis’ but also to guarantee market stability now, to promote the investment into American industry and to finally claw ourselves out of this god damn crisis. It’s been too long and there are too many other dangers that are out of our control, we need to step up and take care of the things that are in our control and that we know work!

May 2, 2012

mohandasgandhi:

paxamericana:

joshsternberg:

kileyrae:

think4yourself:

Video of Shep Smith’s reaction to Mitt Romney’s response to Newt dropping out

(via The Maddow Blog - Quote of the Day)

At first I was really distracted because there were so many things flashing and moving around him, but yes, Shep, politics is weird and you are creepy. I mean politics… politics is creepy.

So much win in this. 

Shep Smith is the last person at Fox with any connection to the real world. If he doesn’t write a tell-all book when he leaves FNC I’m gonna be mad as hell. 

That was profound, Shep. That was probably the truest thing ever said on Fox News.

“Politics is weird, and creepy, and now I know lacks even the loosest attachment to anything like reality.”
— Shep Smith

Fox News finally gets it right.

May 1, 2012
Other-Stuff: Mitten’s Mates and Mexico

other-stuff:

Wal-Mart executive in bribery coverup works at Romney equity fund - POLITICO.com

Turns out, the former Wal-Mart CEO who helped shut down an investigation of bribery by store officials in Mexico is an operating partner at a private equity fund started by Mitt Romney, his eldest son and his campaign finance director.

H. Lee Scott Jr. became an operating partner at the Romney fund, Solamere Capital, eight months after he left Wal-Mart in 2009. Solamere’s partners and investors include major Romney campaign donors and staffers. Romney was a senior adviser and the first investor in the fund, putting up $10 million.

The Times reported that Scott rebuked internal investigators for being too agressive in uncovering bribery by store officials in Mexico. The investigators allegedly found credible evidence that some $24 million in bribes allowed the store to dominate the market in Mexico, but Scott and others hushed up the investigation until the Times disclosed it Sunday.

The link was first reported by the Boston Globe, where I did some extensive reporting on the $250 million private equity fund last fall. Romney resigned from his role in advising the fund when he announced his run for president, but his son and his campaign finance director, Spencer Zwick, remain managing partners. Scott is still an operating partner.

Oh, Mittens! Say it ain’t so.

(Source: sarahlee310)

May 1, 2012
"If any man tells you he loves America, yet hates labor, he is a liar. If any man tells you he trusts America, yet fears labor, he is a fool. All that harms labor is treason to America."

Abraham Lincoln (via azspot)

“The workingmen of Europe feel sure that, as the American War of Independence initiated a new era of ascendancy for the middle class, so the American Antislavery War will do for the working classes. They consider it an earnest of the epoch to come that it fell to the lot of Abraham Lincoln, the single-minded son of the working class, to lead his country through the matchless struggle for the rescue of an enchained race and the reconstruction of a social world.”
(surprise!)

(via azspot)